Continuous integration¶
Ryll's CI runs in two tiers, and develop is behind a merge
queue. The short version: a pull request runs the cheap, fast
checks on our own hardware, and the expensive cross-platform
builds run exactly once, against the commit that is about to
land.
This page describes what runs where, how to read a failure, and how the pieces fit together. For building and testing locally see development.md.
Why two tiers¶
Every ryll change used to run about fifteen jobs, including four
fuzz builds and four cross-platform builds. The common failure
was a cheap job failing — most often cargo deny on advisory
drift — while eight heavy jobs ran to completion anyway. Most of
the compute in a failed run was wasted, and the slowest jobs sat
directly on pull request feedback latency.
The two-tier scheme is modelled on
shakenfist/shakenfist's functional-tests.yml, which in turn
implements the merge queue gate pattern described by
boinkor.net.
The two tiers¶
All of CI lives in .github/workflows/ci.yml.
The smoke tier runs on pull_request and gates the Can
enqueue status check:
| Job | Runner | What it does |
|---|---|---|
Lint |
self-hosted l |
make lint (rustfmt + clippy) |
Cross-check Windows |
self-hosted l |
make check-windows |
Build (Linux x86_64) |
self-hosted l |
make release, both --web smoke tests, make test, .deb and .rpm |
cargo audit |
self-hosted s |
RustSec advisory check |
cargo deny |
self-hosted s |
Licence, ban, and advisory policy (deny.toml) |
gitleaks |
self-hosted s |
Secret scanning over full history |
shellcheck |
self-hosted s |
tools/run-shellcheck.sh, then tools/audit/test-audit-range.sh |
bidi and zero-width |
self-hosted s |
tools/check-bidi.sh |
skillsaw |
self-hosted s |
pre-commit run skillsaw over the agent context |
The merge tier runs on merge_group and gates Can merge:
| Job | Runner | What it does |
|---|---|---|
Fuzz (×4) |
self-hosted l |
Build and smoke-run each cargo-fuzz target |
Build (Linux aarch64) |
ubuntu-24.04-arm |
Build, test, --web smokes, .deb, .rpm |
Build (macOS aarch64) |
macos-latest |
Build, test, tarball |
Build (Windows x86_64) |
windows-latest |
Build, test, zip (--no-default-features) |
Build (Windows aarch64) |
windows-11-arm |
Build, test, zip (--no-default-features) |
In practice the smoke tier finishes in about ten minutes, paced by the Linux build, and the merge tier in about fifteen, paced by the Windows x86_64 build.
workflow_dispatch deliberately runs both tiers, which is
what makes @shakenfist-bot please retest a full retest.
The Windows cross-check is a proxy¶
make check-windows cross-compiles the
x86_64-pc-windows-gnu triple from the Linux devcontainer. It
is a cheap stand-in for the merge tier's real Windows builds,
not a replacement: it catches cfg(windows) and windows-sys
breakage, which is what actually breaks in practice, but not
target_env = "msvc" differences, link failures, or anything
aarch64-specific. The msvc triple cannot be checked from Linux
without an MSVC toolchain, because cargo check still runs
build scripts and aws-lc-sys compiles vendored BoringSSL C for
the target. See
PLAN-two-stage-ci.md.
The three gates¶
The develop ruleset requires exactly three status checks, and
none of them builds anything — they are aggregators over the
jobs that do:
Can see statusrunstrueon every event. It exists so the ruleset always has at least one check it can see, on both pull requests and merge groups.Can enqueuedepends on every smoke-tier job and runs only when the event is notmerge_group.Can mergedepends on every merge-tier job and runs only when the event ismerge_group.
Each gate uses if: always() so it still runs when a dependency
failed or was skipped, and then evaluates a jq expression over
the needs context that maps each dependency to "success or
skipped" and requires all of them:
Treating a skipped dependency as success is what makes the review-only fast path work — see below. A failed or cancelled dependency fails the gate.
The gate that does not apply to a given event is itself skipped,
and GitHub treats a skipped required check as satisfied. That is
why Can merge being skipped does not block a pull request, and
Can enqueue being skipped does not block a merge group.
Adding a job means editing a gate
A new job is not really required until it is in a gate's
needs list. Add smoke-tier jobs to can_enqueue (and, if
the automated reviewer should wait for them, to
automated_reviewer); add merge-tier jobs to can_merge. A
job that no gate depends on can fail without blocking
anything.
The life of a pull request¶
- You push a branch and open a pull request against
develop. - The smoke tier runs. The automated reviewer runs once every smoke job has passed.
Can enqueuegoes green.Can mergeshows as skipped.- You merge the pull request. GitHub does not merge it immediately — it adds it to the merge queue.
- The queue creates a
gh-readonly-queue/develop/pr-N-<sha>ref containing your change merged onto the currentdevelop, and CI runs on it with themerge_groupevent. Only the merge tier runs; every smoke-tier job is skipped. Can mergegoes green and the queue movesdevelopto the merge commit it just tested.
The queue is configured with ALLGREEN grouping and
max_entries_to_build: 1, which deliberately disables
speculative stacking: one entry builds at a time. For a
single-developer project on a loaded CI cluster that trades peak
throughput for never wasting a run on a speculative build that
gets ejected and rebuilt.
Reading a merge queue ejection¶
If a merge-tier job fails, Can merge fails, and GitHub removes
the pull request from the queue. This is the part that surprises
people:
The failing checks do not appear in the pull request's checks list. They ran against the merge group ref, not against your branch, so the pull request shows only a timeline event saying it was removed from the merge queue.
To find out what happened:
- Follow the link in that timeline event, or
- go to Actions → CI and look for the run whose branch is
gh-readonly-queue/develop/pr-<your PR>-<sha>.
An ejection means one of two things. Either your change really does break a platform the smoke tier cannot see — the usual suspects are the msvc Windows builds and anything that only compiles on aarch64 — or the merge tier hit infrastructure flakiness. Push a fix and merge again, or just re-queue the unchanged pull request if you believe it was flaky.
A queued entry is also rebuilt when develop moves underneath
it, which the prune-reviews bot does after most merges. With
one entry at a time this is usually invisible, but it is the
thing to look at if you see queue churn.
Review-only changes¶
Changes that touch only the code-review artefacts —
REVIEWS.md, .vscode/*.weaudit, .vscode/*.weaudit-shas.json
and .vscode/review-scope.toml — cannot affect the build, so
the check_paths job skips every tier job for them. Both gates
still pass, because their jq counts a skipped dependency as
success, so such a pull request goes through the queue without
running a single build.
check_paths uses dorny/paths-filter with
predicate-quantifier: 'every'. That matters: with the default
quantifier a file matches if it matches any pattern, so '**'
would match everything and silently defeat the !REVIEWS.md
exclusions. Keep its skip list in sync with the .vscode
whitelist in .gitignore and with codeql-analysis.yml.
Retesting¶
Commenting @shakenfist-bot please retest on a pull request
runs gh workflow run ci.yml against the branch. Because
workflow_dispatch runs both tiers, this exercises the merge
tier on the branch — useful for confirming a Windows or macOS
fix before queueing, rather than discovering it by ejection.
A dispatch run does not report into a queued entry. To retest something already in the queue, remove it from the queue and add it again.
Where binaries come from¶
There is no longer a push: branches: [develop] trigger on
ci.yml. The merge queue already tests the exact commit that
lands, so a push-triggered run would only repeat it.
| You want | Look at |
|---|---|
| Binaries for a pull request | The Build (Linux x86_64) job's artifacts on the pull request's CI run (.deb and .rpm, 30-day retention) |
Binaries for a develop SHA |
The merge_group CI run that landed it — all four platform builds attach their artifacts there |
| Binaries for an arbitrary branch | Run manual-build.yml (Actions → Manual build) and pick the platforms |
| Release binaries | release.yml, triggered by a v* tag — see releasing.md |
Branch protection and the bot¶
The develop ruleset ("Develop branch") requires a pull
request, enables the merge queue, requires the three gate
checks, and blocks deletion and non-fast-forward pushes.
The one thing that still pushes directly to develop is the
prune-reviews workflow, which drops review marks invalidated
by whatever just merged. It authenticates as shakenfist-bot
using the DEPENDENCIES_TOKEN secret; the bot is a member of
the "SF Can Skip Merge Queue" team, which is the ruleset's
bypass actor. GitHub does not accept the built-in Actions app as
a bypass actor at all, so the token is load-bearing rather than
a preference. That team also contains a human, which is the
escape hatch if the ruleset ever wedges.
A push made with a personal access token retriggers workflows,
where a GITHUB_TOKEN push does not, so prune-reviews
triggers itself once. That is safe rather than a loop: the
second run finds nothing to prune and exits before committing.
The workflow is guarded to refs/heads/develop, because
tools/ci-prune-reviews.sh rebases onto develop and pushes to
develop whatever ref was checked out — dispatching it on a
branch would otherwise push that branch's unmerged commits
straight to develop.
Ruleset changes are captured under .github/exported-config/
by export-repo-config.yml, which runs daily and on demand.
Reproducing CI locally¶
Every Linux x86_64 job runs inside the devcontainer via the Makefile, so the local commands are the ones CI runs:
make lint # rustfmt + clippy, as the Lint job
make check-windows # the Windows cross-check
make test # the unit test suite
make web-smoke # --web startup and shutdown
make web-smoke-tls # the same, with TLS
The merge tier cannot be reproduced locally — we own no macOS,
Windows, or aarch64 Linux hardware, which is also why those jobs
use GitHub-hosted runners and carry audit-ok:
github-hosted-runner markers for the workflow-standards
consistency audit.
Workflow inventory¶
| Workflow | Purpose |
|---|---|
ci.yml |
Smoke tier and merge tier, the three gates, and the automated PR review |
manual-build.yml |
On-demand binary builds of arbitrary branches |
release.yml |
Build and publish release artifacts |
codeql-analysis.yml |
CodeQL security scanning |
supply-chain.yml |
Weekly advisory drift against develop (cargo-audit, cargo-deny); the PR-time scanners live in ci.yml |
renovate.yml |
Automated dependency updates (hourly) |
export-repo-config.yml |
Daily repository configuration export |
pr-re-review.yml |
Bot-triggered PR re-review (@shakenfist-bot please re-review) |
pr-address-comments.yml |
Bot-triggered comment addressing (@shakenfist-bot please address comments) |
pr-retest.yml |
Bot-triggered CI re-run (@shakenfist-bot please retest) |
prune-reviews.yml |
Prune stale review marks after each push to develop |
Concurrency¶
Every job a pull request or PR comment can trigger must declare
a job-level concurrency: block that cancels superseded runs.
The self-hosted fleet runs MAX_WORKERS = 6 across every
Shaken Fist repository, and the l pool is its scarcest
resource: without a concurrency group a superseded run can hold
an l slot for its full 45-minute timeout while its replacement
queues behind it.
Use the job-level form rather than the workflow-level one, so that unrelated jobs in the same workflow do not cancel each other:
jobs:
my-job:
runs-on: [self-hosted, vm, debian-12, s]
concurrency:
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}-my-job
cancel-in-progress: true
Comment-triggered workflows (pr-retest, pr-re-review,
pr-address-comments) need a different group key:
github.ref points at the default branch for issue_comment
events, so it does not distinguish one pull request from
another. The PR number does.
Merge queue jobs need a different key again. On merge_group,
github.ref is the per-attempt queue branch
gh-readonly-queue/develop/pr-<N>-<SHA>, and GitHub mints a
fresh SHA every time it rebuilds the group — which it does on
every push to develop. A group keyed on it is therefore unique
per rebuild, cancel-in-progress never matches, and superseded
merge groups run to completion holding runners the whole fleet
shares. Branch the key on the event:
group: >-
${{ github.workflow }}-my-job-${{
github.event_name == 'merge_group'
&& format('merge_group-{0}', github.event.merge_group.base_ref)
|| github.ref }}
The merge_group- prefix keeps a queue run from sharing a group
with a workflow_dispatch run on develop, whose github.ref
is the same string.
Cancelling a merge group is only safe because the queue is
serial: the develop ruleset sets max_entries_to_build: 1, so
the queue builds one entry at a time and any other in-flight
merge_group run is by definition superseded, its queue branch
already abandoned by GitHub. That setting and this key have to
move together. See
shakenfist/kerbside#284
for what the unfixed version cost, and the fleet audit
merge-group-cancellation.
Scheduled, push-to-default, and release workflows must not
enable cancel-in-progress. Cancelling a release mid-publish,
or a renovate run mid-PR-creation, leaves partial state behind.
Build network isolation¶
Cargo runs a dependency's build.rs as ordinary code at compile
time, so a compromised crate can execute during a plain cargo
build — before any ryll code runs, and on every job that merely
compiles. To contain that, the Makefile splits the build in two:
make fetch(cargo fetch) downloads every crate named inCargo.lockbut compiles nothing, so no build script runs. It is the only build step allowed network access.- the targets that compile the workspace —
build,build-tokio-console,release,check-windows,test,lintandlint-fix— then run in the devcontainer with--network noneand the cargo cache mounted read-only. A malicious build script cannot reach a C2 or exfiltrate secrets (its download call fails and the build aborts loudly), and it cannot poison the cache for the rest of the job.
This is the same reason docs.rs builds every crate offline, and is
what would have turned the 2026-08-20 arrayref / proc-macro1
build-script dropper (reported as rustsec/advisory-db#3161; no
RUSTSEC-YYYY-NNNN id had been assigned at the time of writing)
into a loud build failure rather than a silent compromise.
Three targets still compile with the network up, and both of the
lanes they serve are real: fuzz runs on every merge-group entry
and publish-crates on every release.
fuzz-build-%andfuzz-smoke-%build the detached fuzz workspace (seeshakenfist-spice-protocol/fuzz/Cargo.toml's[workspace]table), whichmake fetchdoes not populate, so they must still resolve and download at compile time. Isolating them needs a secondcargo fetchagainst that workspace first, tracked in ryll#306.publish-cratesrunscargo publish, which builds each crate as part of its verify step and genuinely needs the network to upload. This one cannot be isolated.
(fuzz-fmt-check also runs networked, but it only runs cargo
fmt --check and compiles nothing. So do deb, rpm and the
web-smoke targets, which repackage or run the binary release
already produced.)
Outside the Makefile entirely: release's build-ryll-wheels job
runs tools/build-ryll-wheel.sh, which builds ryll with maturin
inside quay.io/pypa/manylinux_2_28_* rather than the
devcontainer, with network and without --frozen. That is a
shipped artifact — it is what pip install ryll gets — so it is
the most significant gap here. Closing it needs the same
fetch/compile split inside the manylinux image, tracked in
ryll#305; until then the wheel is built on the same
terms as before this change.
Because those jobs write the cargo cache with the network up,
they save it under their own actions/cache key prefix
(fuzz-cargo-cache, publish-cargo-cache) rather than the shared
one. Otherwise a networked, writable-cache job could hand the next
run's isolated build the very cache the read-only mount exists to
protect — the mount stops poisoning within a job, not across them.
What the isolation does not buy: the checkout stays mounted
read-write, because the build has to write target/. A build
script running offline can therefore still modify the source tree,
tools/*.sh and the build output — the defence stops exfiltration
and cache poisoning, not tampering. That matters because networked
steps run afterwards in the same workspace (make deb, make
rpm, make web-smoke, and the release job's upload of
target/release/ryll as a shipped artifact), against a tree an
earlier build script could have touched.
The download cache lives in .cargo-cache and is persisted across
runs by an actions/cache step, keyed on Cargo.lock, inserted
after actions/checkout — whose default clean: true runs git
clean -ffdx and would otherwise delete the gitignored cache every
run. Point CARGO_CACHE at a path outside the checkout to
relocate it. (The cross-platform merge-tier jobs build with a
natively installed cargo rather than in the devcontainer and use
Swatinem/rust-cache; the --network none isolation applies only
to the containerised Linux builds.)
Severing the network namespace leaves the container with only
lo, which the WebRTC tests notice: the default UDP bind policy
excludes loopback, so on such a host it correctly resolves to
nothing and refuses to build a peer connection (see
shakenfist-spice-webrtc/src/bind_addrs.rs). Tests go through
bind_addrs_for_tests, bind_policy_for_tests and
WebrtcBridgeConfig::for_tests instead, which fall back to
binding loopback when the host offers nothing else — the peers
they connect are in the same process, so a loopback candidate
serves. The production default is deliberately left alone: a
server that quietly bound loopback would advertise candidates no
browser could reach, which is what --web-media-addr 127.0.0.1
exists to make a deliberate choice.
The trade-off to know about: under isolation those tests no longer exercise binding a real interface address, which is the failure a wrong bind address produces. Nothing in CI covers that — it is what the browser session in the webrtc-rs 0.20 upgrade's soak phase is for. The inversion is worth stating too: every CI run of the WebRTC suite now takes the loopback fallback, so the branch that picks a real interface address runs only on developer machines.
Supply-chain policy¶
The scanner jobs above enforce policy that lives in files at the repository root, and changing that policy has rules the files themselves do not state:
- Ignoring a RustSec advisory requires adding the advisory
ID to both
deny.tomland.cargo/audit.toml, with an inline comment on each entry giving the rationale. Both scanners run on every pull request and both must pass, so the two ignore lists have to stay in sync — editing onlydeny.tomlproduces a redcargo auditjob. Ignores are debt and should not accumulate silently. - Allowing a new licence means adding a permissive SPDX
identifier to
deny.toml'slicenses.allowarray. Thelicenses.exceptionsarray is for a narrower case: a single crate declaring a licence that is not on the general allowlist, scoped so the grant does not apply repository-wide. Theepaint_default_fonts/Ubuntu-font-1.0entry is the canonical example. - Suppressing a gitleaks false positive goes in
.gitleaksignore, with a comment explaining the pattern and why it is safe. ryll runs the upstream gitleaks binary directly rather thangitleaks-action, which requires a paid licence for organisation repositories.